I don't entirely agree. We're talking about being able to identify national characteristics. I'm English, and long before I left England I could have told you 10 adjectives I felt described our national character. Whether or not I would be right, doesn't matter. It doesn't mean I can't try. You yourself said you are interested in people's observations based on their experience. Well that counts true for all. If you start narrowing the type of experiences that permit someone to make such an observation, your two views conflict with each other.Originally Posted by Maciamo
Forgive my curiosity, but do you never miss an opportunity to bash the Japanese for being prejudiced against foreigners? Perhaps you're misunderstood, or don't do it intentionally (maybe I'm missing something here), but I'm surprised that the admin of a Japanese forum seems to have such a low view of the Japanese people.Maybe that is why so many Japanese have such strong prejudices against foreigners, as too many of them have never lived abroad or interacted with foreigners in their own cultural environment (foreigners in Japan often don't behave as they would in their home country, justly because they are in a different culture and society).
Fair enough, but then wouldn't you say that boiling down the Japanese to 10 words is also rather overly simplistic and doesn't reflect the diversity that exists in all countries (Japan and Belgium included).As for Belgium, I find it much harder to define its national character, even after living in many countries, than defining the one of other countries where I have lived. But maybe that is because there is more than one dominant culture in Belgium.
I have no issue with this thread per se, but I don't think we will learn anything from it that we don't already know.
Bookmarks